Sports Medicine Research: In the Lab & In the Field: Compensatory Landing Strategies Upon Return to Sport after ACL Reconstructions (Sports Med Res)


Thursday, September 1, 2011

Compensatory Landing Strategies Upon Return to Sport after ACL Reconstructions

Effects of Sex on Compensatory Landing Strategies Upon Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Raud MJ, Myer GD, Hewett TE. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(8):553-559.

Clinical guidelines for return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are variable. A systematic review (Kvist 2004) of return to sport (RTS) criteria found that resolving symptoms and lower extremity strength impairments, functional performance testing, temporal guidelines, and mechanical stability were the primary focus for RTS criteria. However, even with these criteria athletes are continuing to re-injure their surgically repaired knee or their contralateral knee at high rates. Previous studies by Paterno et al evaluated movement patterns during dynamic tasks in individuals 1 year after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). They found kinematic (knee adduction angle) limb asymmetries were predictive of re-injury; thus it is important to evaluate these individuals when they RTS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate biomechanical difference between limbs in 56 individuals with ACL-R at the time of RTS (35 female, 21 male) and compare them to 42 healthy controls (29 females, 13 males). All of the volunteers participated in level 1 or 2 activities (sports involving cutting, jumping or pivoting) > 50 hours/year. ACL-R participants were cleared by both a physical therapist and physician. Data were collected within 4 weeks of their RTS (average time between ACL-R and RTS = 6.9 months). All participants completed a bilateral drop vertical jump task that involved dropping off of a 31-cm box, landing with each foot on a separate force plate followed by a quick vertical jump. The vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during the landing phase, from initial contact with the force plate to when the body’s center of mass reached the lowest point, was evaluated in 3 successful trials. A limb symmetry index of peak vGRF (involved limb divided by uninvolved limb) was calculated to assess overall side-to-side differences between groups. Regardless of sex, the ACL-R group demonstrated asymmetries between limbs, with the involved (ACL-R) limb demonstrating a significantly lower peak vGRF. When compared to either limb of the control participants, the ACL-R participant’s involved limb continued to have a lower peak vGRF. The limb symmetry index of peak vGRF demonstrated a difference between the ACL-R group and the control group, indicating a significant asymmetry in the ACL-R group compared to controls.

This study demonstrates that at the time of RTS ACL-R participants demonstrate limb asymmetries during dynamic tasks (e.g., the involved limb demonstrating a lower peak vGRF). This suggests that there is increased force through the contralateral limb and thus puts this limb at risk for injury. This is consistent with a recently reviewed systematic review that found a higher injury rate in the contralateral knee 5 years after ACL-R. These studies suggest that differences between limbs are present at the time of RTS and may influence the increased risk of re-injury at 5 years after ACL-R. What we do not know is if these asymmetries ever resolve. There is limited evidence that evaluates differences between limbs in a long-term follow up. Furthermore, according to the systematic review of RTS criteria (Kvist 2004), these asymmetries and compensatory strategies are not typically evaluated when an athlete is returning to sport. Should this be a part of the RTS criteria? What are your criteria for allowing ACL-R athletes to RTS? Do you evaluate limb asymmetries? Do you think if we minimize limb asymmetries before RTS that there would be a lower re-injury rate? 

Written by: Kathleen White PT, DPT
Reviewed by: Jeffrey Driban

Related Posts:


John Goetschius said...

I feel that limb asymmetries and compensatory strategies should be assessed and addressed prior to RTS, however the it seems that the current techniques we have for evaluating these difference would make it difficult to apply to the general clinical setting (similar to biomechanical assessments attempting to identify those at risk for a primary ACL injury) Also, before we can begin holding athletes from participation I feel we must have a defined method for correcting these differences. Perhaps incorporating neuromuscular training programs designed to reduce primary ACL injury risk early in the rehabilitation process post-reconstruction could help address the asymmetries and reduce injury risk as they have with healthy patients?

Kathleen White said...

Thanks for the great comment. The current methods used to identify limb symmetries are not easily accessible to all clinicians. We need a more clinician friendly method.

Researchers and clinicians have been trying for years to identify the best measures to determine return to sport eligibility. Despite these attempts re-injury rates are high and athletes still do not return to 100% playing level.

I think that post-operative neuromuscular training would be a great intervention to improve these asymmetries before returning to sport. This is a great area where further research could be done.

Post a Comment

When you submit a comment please click 'Subscribe by Email" (just below the comments) or "Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)" (at the bottom of this page) if you would like to receive a notification when another comment has been submitted to this post.

Please note that if you are using Safari and have problems submitting comments you may need to go to your preferences (privacy tab) and stop blocking third party cookies. Sorry for any inconvenience this may pose.