The King-Devick test for sideline concussion screening in collegiate football
Leong DF, Balcer LJ, Galetta SL, Evans G, Gimre M, Watt D. Journal of Optometry. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2014.12.005. [Epub]
Take Home Message: The King-Devick test is a quick and reliable method to assess vision, eye movements, language function, and attention. An athlete with a concussion tends to complete the test slower than his/her preseason assessment while other athletes improve over time.
With recent attention on the potential consequences associated with concussions there has been an emphasis on rapid and accurate diagnosis of concussions. This will aid in removal from activity to assist recovery and hopefully prevent athletes from sustaining further head trauma. The purpose of this article was to assess the validity of the King-Devick test as a sideline concussion assessment among collegiate athletes. 127 student-athletes (football, men’s and women’s basketball) with a mean age of ~20 years participated in this study. Participants completed a baseline King-Devick test during preseason physicals. The test takes two minutes and requires an athlete to quickly read a series of numbers on three test cards. If an athlete sustained a concussion then he/she completed the King-Devick test and Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT-2) immediately on the sideline. Non-concussed participants completed post-season testing to compare to the baseline results in order to assess performance changes and reliability over the season. Basketball players also completed the test immediately after an intense sprint workout to see how the test was affected by exercise. During the course of the season 11 athletes sustained a concussion and 9 failed their sideline SCAT-2 test. The authors found that individuals who suffered a concussion took longer to complete the King-Devick test compared with their baseline measurements. On average concussed participants took 4.4 seconds longer compared with their baseline times. In contrast, participants without a concussion were slightly faster during post-season testing, which may indicate a learning effect. The test had excellent retest reliability from baseline to post-season in non-concussed participants. The post-workout results were similar to the post-season results, which indicated that fatigue did not influence the test times.
The King-Devick test appears to be a valid and reliable assessment for concussions among college athletes. The King-Devick tests’ portability and simplistic approach makes it an ideal sideline assessment for detecting changes in quick eye movements and saccades observed in individuals suffering from head trauma. Although the King-Devick test seems to be an effective method to assess concussions, it is not clear yet if it can serve as a standalone evaluation. Multiple measures may be ideal to gain a complete picture of an individual athlete's symptoms and deficits. Considering there are limited studies on the King-Devick test, more research needs to be completed to assess its’ effectiveness to assist clinicians for rehabilitation purposes and return-to-play decisions. It is important to note that this study had a small number of athletes with concussions, which limits our ability to apply these results to other collegiate athletes and limited the authors’ ability to suggest clinically relevant cut-points that may differentiate athletes with or without a concussion. Despite these limitations, this is another tool sports medicine professionals may use on the sidelines to assist in the rapid detection of concussions.
Questions for Discussion: What sideline assessments do you use for concussions? Which do you think are the most effective? Have you tried using the King-Devick test?
Written by: Adam Rosen and Andrew Sheridan
Reviewed by: Jeffrey Driban