Sports Medicine Research: In the Lab & In the Field: Is a Rule Change Necessary to Decrease Concussions in the NHL? (Sports Med Res)
Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Is a Rule Change Necessary to Decrease Concussions in the NHL?

A systematic video analysis of National Hockey League (NHL) concussions, part II: how concussions occur in the NHL

Hutchinson MG., Comper P., Meeuwisse WH., Echemendia RJ. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013; ahead of print.

Take Home Message: The predominate mechanisms of concussions in the NHL are player to opponent contact. This is usually directed to the lateral aspect of the head by the shoulder, elbow, or glove. Players that sustain a concussion typically do not have the puck and often a penalty was not called on the play.

Across all levels of play and age groups within ice hockey, concussions are one of the most common injuries that athletes suffer. Little is known about the exact mechanisms of how concussions occur in ice hockey. Establishing the most common mechanisms of how ice hockey players receive concussions will increase concussion awareness and education as well as assist medical professionals to detect potential concussive events. Therefore, the purposes of this study was to describe how concussions occur in the NHL as well as identify the association of concussion injuries with puck possession and penalties given at the time of concussive injury. Two raters individually viewed digital video records of physician-diagnosed concussions from the NHL injury surveillance system from over a 3.5-year period during the 2006-2010 seasons. The raters coded the digital video records of concussions using the Heads Up Checklist, which provided a standardized framework for coding injury mechanisms of concussion. The Heads Up Checklist contained 17 specific factors organized into 3 broad sections: event, game situation, and equipment. A total of 260 concussions occurred in the 4299 NHL regular season games of which 197 were identified on video and analyzed in the study. Eighty-eight percent of the concussive events were associated with player-to-player contact. Approximately 35% (71/197) of all concussions during the 3.5 seasons were classified as a direction contact to the lateral aspect of the head by shoulders, elbows, or gloves. Sixteen out of the 197 concussive events were due to fighting. During these 16 events the player experienced a direct blow to the head by fist or by striking the ice surface. Concussions not caused by fighting resulted mostly from direct contact from the shoulder (55%), elbow (21%), or gloves (12%). The most common body part initially contacted was the head (68%) followed by torso (28%). The most common location of the initial contact to the head was laterally (47%) followed by anteriorly (18%) and posteriorly (3%). The most common initial contact to the torso was posteriorly (13%) followed by laterally (11%) and anteriorly (3%). When considering concussive events (excluding fighting), 23% of concussed players had possession of the puck, 34% had no possession of the puck, and 42% of players just released the puck. Of the events evaluated there was sufficient information to determine whether a penalty was called for 168 events. Of these 49 events were considered penalties and 37 were deemed rule violations but the officials gave no penalty.

Within the time period October 2006 to December 2009 most of the concussions suffered were characterized by player-to-player contact. These contacts were most often characterized by a hit to the lateral aspect of the head by the opposing players’ shoulders, elbows, or gloves when the injured player was not in possession of the puck. Furthermore, the officials often did not call a penalty on the play. The finding of a clear mechanism that warranted a penalty when no penalty was given provides evidence for including a rule-based approach to reduce the occurrence of concussive events. Medical professionals should be cognizant of the predominant mechanisms associated with concussions in NHL as well as educate athletes about the common mechanisms of concussive events. Similar to this study a video analysis within a high school lacrosse population found that most concussions occurred by a direct hit to the athlete’s head (79%), while the athlete was not in possession of the ball (59%), and a penalty was rarely called on the play (26%). Therefore, these three findings may apply to different sports and skill levels.

Questions for Discussion: Do you think a rule change would help decrease the occurrence of concussions within the NHL? If fighting was not allowed in the NHL do you think less people would be interested in watching the sport?

Written by: Jane McDevitt PhD, ATC, CSCS
Reviewed by: Jeffrey Driban

Related Posts:


Hutchison MG, Comper P, Meeuwisse WH, & Echemendia RJ (2013). A systematic video analysis of National Hockey League (NHL) concussions, part II: how concussions occur in the NHL. British journal of sports medicine PMID: 23637116

3 comments:

Sara Dorsten said...

I am so glad that research to determine the mechanism of concussions in hockey is finally being done. I feel as though many of people who conduct research on concussions focus more on American football than any other sport, when there is still so much research to be done outside of just that one sport. According to the research done here it states that most concussions in the NHL occur during player-to-player contact when they usually do not have control of the puck. This leads to asking the question of whether there should be a rule change to help prevent the occurrence of concussions in hockey and would this rule change decrease the interest in the sport? In my opinion I believe a rule change would be beneficial in reducing the amount of concussions in the NHL because of the evidence shown in this research, but I do think it would effect the interests of the fans. People enjoy watching hockey because it is so fast-paced and intense, and I feel that if you remove the fighting or reduce the hitting the sport itself will face the consequence of people losing interest. I know that is why I personally enjoy watching hockey. And if you compare this rule change to the recent rule change in the NFL, I would expect the NHL to receive the same negative reactions as the NFL. However, is this a risk that the NHL should be willing to take in order to reduce the amount of concussions and protect the athletes? Personally I would say absolutely, because what is more important: the interest ratings or the safety of the athletes?

Sara Dorsten, ATC, LAT

Jane McDevitt said...

Sara-

I agree with you. A rule change that reflects the recent concussion research should be in the works. Even if they start being stricter and enforcing the penalties they do have in place may be beneficial (42% of the player to play contact without fighting happened due to a late hit and 34% had no possession of the puck at all). I would have to say implementing a rule change or enforcing more severe penalties on late hits or hits on those with no possession would be a great place to start. I don't know how long a rule change would take at the professional level, but (going back to your NFL comparison) if the NHL doesn't start analyzing and taking the safety of their athletes into consideration they are going to have a huge lawsuit on their hands in the future!

Alex Ruxton said...

Recently, the NHL did implement a new icing rule. The new rule reduces the amount of collisions that happen with the players going full speed, typically hitting each other into the boards. I think more research needs to be done in the NHL to reduce the amount of concussions. I think this is a good start by the NHL making a new rule change. Fans pay to watch the best players play and I think it would be smart for the NHL to enforce rules that can possibly decrease the risk of injury.

Post a Comment

When you submit a comment please click 'Subscribe by Email" (just below the comments) or "Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)" (at the bottom of this page) if you would like to receive a notification when another comment has been submitted to this post.

Please note that if you are using Safari and have problems submitting comments you may need to go to your preferences (privacy tab) and stop blocking third party cookies. Sorry for any inconvenience this may pose.